LONDON (Reuters) - rich energy, a drink emblem that currently lost a copyright infringement case over its brand, stated on Wednesday it had cancelled a identify sponsorship of the Haas components One crew due to “poor performance”.

there has been no instant comment from the U.S.

.-owned crew.

Branding for the electricity drink has been distinguished at the crew’s black and gold cars because the start of the season, while the agency has also made waves with a combative presence on social media.

“We aim to conquer @redbullracing & being behind @WilliamsRacing in Austria is unacceptable,” wealthy stated on its Twitter feed in advance of this weekend’s British Grand Prix at Silverstone.

“The politics and laptop attitude in @F1 is also inhibiting our enterprise. We want the team nicely,” it delivered.

Former champions purple Bull Racing are 0.33 in the championship and gained the Austrian grand prix on the cease of closing month. Ferrari-powered Haas are 9th out of the ten teams, albeit simplest six points behind sixth-located Alfa Romeo.

Danish motive force Kevin Magnussen finished at the back of George Russell’s Williams at Spielberg after a pressure-through penalty. Williams are final and yet to attain a point this yr.

Questions had been asked through the formulation One media about the energy drink emblem’s price range and statements by business enterprise boss William Storey.

In may additionally rich misplaced a court case added towards it by means of Whyte bikes for copyright infringement of its stag’s head emblem, which become removed from the components One cars.

choose Melissa Clarke said in a written judgement that she determined wealthy strength boss William Storey and Sean Kelly, founder of the digital marketing corporation Staxoweb Ltd, to be “negative witnesses”.

“He had a tendency to make magnificent statements, which on in addition investigation or attention had been now not pretty what they appeared,” she said of Storey.

The choose cited as an instance that after move-tested approximately a claim to the media in February that 90 million cans had been produced, Storey explained that rich “had produced 90 million cans, but had no longer yet stuffed and offered them”.